Why in Spain does one speak about terrorism without mentioning the yihadistas?

Literal transcription of the text that Eulogio Paz - father of Eulogio Paz Manjón, murdered along with 190 persons more in the offense yihadista of 11M, in Madrid - has sent ImP: Owing to the celebration of VI International Congress on Victims of terrorism, organized by the University Foundation San Pablo CEU, his director, Cayetano González, in his titled article The danger of the negligence, was writing (The world, 11.02.2010):" As ETA is disappearing of our lives; as the end is approaching of inexorable form for this group of killers that so much pain has caused in the Basque and Spanish society in the last 40 years - 857 mortal victims and thousands of injured men - major it has to be the determination not to forget the unforgettable thing ". They are only martyrs the electorally useful ones Again an explicit number that it does not include - it cannot include them because it was not ETA - to the 191 murdered ones 11-M. [Cayetano González] keeps on writing:" We cannot forget the unforgettable thing. In our case that means that we cannot forget that for defending our freedom, our system of coexistence, our Constitution, many persons have given everything, up to our own life. Members of the Civil Guard, of the National Body of Police, of the Armed forces, of the Ertzaintza, of Mossos d'Esquadra, municipal police officers, politicians of UCD, AP, Spanish socialist party, UPN, PP, judges, businessmen, journalists, children, citizens without any political ascription have been murdered vilely by the terrorist band ETA. And, if this, the brutal offense had not been sufficient, March 11, 2004, with the result of 192 dead persons and thousands of wounds ". Or, after the whole exhibition of the terrorism of ETA it names 11-M like one more addition, how a diffuse and confused added one, omitting the responsibility of the Islamist terrorism of To The Qaeda. The fear is free and it can lead to without pronouncing the name of the snake, or of the bug. Certainly, I do not feel represented in a victims' congress that is not capable of calling to the things for his name. I do not even feel represented in this article of Cayetano González, who does not have the fearlessness not the valor sufficient of quoting the responsibility yihadista of 11-M. A reflection of the satanizado Waiter Continuing with this reflection I want to mention the titled article of Baltasar Garzón and Dolores Delgado Terrorismo of going and return. Baltasar Garzón is a magistrate judge of the National Hearing and Dolores Delgado, coordinating district attorney of international terrorism. In this article (The country, 20.12.2009) there is a very important observation that I am going to review and recount further on with the words related to Josu Puelles, brother of the police officer Eduardo Puelles murdered by ETA. Baltasar Garzón and Dolores Delgado write in the article:" And the fact is that always, let's want or not it, there have been two different perceptions for the local terrorism (ETA) and for the international or global (yihadista). "What I want to review and recount is the following thing. In The world (20.12.2009), under the holder All the victims of all the signs, it is possible to read:" The cartels have sobreimpresos the names of all the victims of terrorism of all the signs: of ETA, of GAL, of Grapo, of Mendeku, of Triple To, that is to say all the dead persons for the terrorist violence ". We are before a clear example of the local perception of the terrorism. Perception that he speaks of" all the victims of terrorism of all the signs "and omits, nevertheless, the Islamist terrorism of 11-M. Not to be, clearly, that it is not a simple oversight product of the informative and formative local vision and, on contrary, an omission is debated to keep on putting 11-M in the ETA orbit. Everything saying till now in this writing seems to fit in what proper Aznar has seen forced to recognize in one of his books, saying:" I must admit that perhaps the Spanish public opinion was not the sufficiently conscious thing, until March 11, of the scope of the threat of the Islamic terrorism, or at least, not so much as it it has been of the ETA terrorism. If it is like that, the Government has undoubtedly a responsibility to be assumed. Perhaps the proper successes obtained in the struggle against ETA in the last years it has led us to lowering the custody before the fundamentalist threat. "(The country, 28.11.2004). Certainly, as the very same Aznar says: has the Government assumed any responsibility on the day of today? His government, skylight. Yes, Aznar's Government when it happened 11-M. I am going to end up by mentioning to the book broken Lives." The text of broken Lives The world gathers the memory of the 857 murdered ones by the band "(04.02.2010). This is what writes in his article - referring to ETA - Angels Escrivá, immediately after the presentation of the book. For nothing the murdered ones 11-M appear between the 857 murdered ones by ETA. No mention. Another blow to the theoretical ones of the conspiracy, to whom, as a result of the hallucinations suffered by his galloping paranoia, they members of ETA appeared marauding for the platforms. IN ADVANCE, another text of Eulogio Paz in ImP: "11-M and journalist? Raúl del Pozo".