"The extreme right has submitted the Supreme Court"

Of that the Spanish Administration of justice does not work as it must there are clear tests. The curious thing is that whenever there is a problem - the one that is - it resorts to the one that is already a cliché: the independence. Why whenever there is a contentious one or a problem - it is the one that is - there are so many judges and magistrates, included those of the Supreme one, those of the General Council of the Judicial Power and those of the professional associations that limit practically everything to the independence?: about what ideological independence do they speak, about the independence of the judges and magistrates that swore the Beginning of the Movement?: or do they refer to the proper independence of the limbo to which, like nonexistent virtue, it is possible only to gain access refusing to think? The ex-one fiscal anticorruption Carlos Jiménez Villarejo in an interview that The country publishes today has summed the situation up saying that the ideology that occupies first place in the Supreme one is that of the extreme right. The reactions have been immediate. And again with the rattle of the independence! Is independence - I ask - equivalent to have sworn allegiance to the Franco period and now to close the eyes before the exploitation of the laws, for example, to prevent the corruption from being investigated? It is clear that in the judicature there are things that smell badly - ideologically speaking - but for the sake of the well-worn independence it turns out that there is seen badly thinking, to criticize and, hence, all - Villarejo and Waiter also - we are forced to say amen and to repeat like loritos that the Spanish Justice accuses shortcomings owed only and exclusively to the absence of independence... Have they taken us as idiots?: or perhaps we it are? Without opening doors and windows, any housing ends up by smelling badly The problem is not that there are political parties, ideologies and discrepancies; not even it is not a problem either that there are judges who think this way or asá. Will the prophets of the independence have thought for the independence that probably there are things that smell badly because the institution has never been aired? Because a thing is that the judicial power is indepediente, that it it is already, and to prohibit other one the judges to have criterion. Will not it be that any of them claim that his criteria are the good only ones, the only ones legítmos, the Spanish only ones and the only ones that are the only, big and free? The axis of the matter is not either that the cavern the haya taken with Baltasar Garzón - the cavern has never stopped working, apart from the fact that the extreme right has constitutional law to exist and to act inside the law-; the really worrying thing is that there are so many followers of a concept uniformador of independence that serves, for example, to do all the possible and the impossible thing to make difficult or to prevent the inhumanaciones of the murdered ones by the Franco period and to make difficult or dinamitar the judicial investigation of the plot Gürtel, between other things. The worrying thing is not that there are sensibilities and ideologies, the worrying thing is that in the judicature there are so many professionals who quite sum it up alluding to the independence... Will 2 refer to that of demayo?" Judges and district attorneys have been 25 years eating of the hand of the banking", has added Villarejo, that very opportunely and without being missing to the truth he has remembered that banking institutions "have contributed important quantities, paying accommodation expenses and of course slightly more"... Live through the independence! The Justice does not work well and they - judges and magistrates - know it. And also they know perfectly that the fundamental problem is not in the ideological independence of the juces and magistrates. Between other things, because nobody who thinks is aideológico. I insist: Will they refer to the independence of May 2, 1808? The one who wants to understand it, will understand it... And if some brains five-peseta coin does not fall down of the donkey, there a track goes: The Spanish Parliament of Cadiz was in his moment more innovative than the Constituent Spanish Parliament of 1977. It would be convenient to speak less of the independence of 1808 and: once and for all!, to open the doors and to air the house so that it stops smelling badly.