To the president of the Supreme Court: We are not subjects, but citizens

Vignette captured in The cave of Daimao Hoy there are spoiled news the declarations realized by the very catholic president of the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Spain, Carlos Dívar, who in addition to mixing religious beliefs with judicial responsibilities, claims that the citizens not only we respect the decisions of the Justice but also we are quiet when they seem clearly unjust, ideological or atrocious to us. In the democratic State of Right it is forced to respect the resolutions of the courts, but that the president of the Supreme Court and of the General Council of the Judicial Power of the democratic State of Right demands forced respect it is, when less, a fruit of his deficient formation as for democratic beginning; this defect, nevertheless, that is understandable in those who swore to fulfill and make to fulfill the laws of a genocidal dictatorship. . No radical Spanish citizen and sincerely democratic he doubts that the judgments of the courts must be respected; more nobody ignores - except the misinformed ones - that in the Spanish Justice device there abound those who during long years kept silence before the systematical theft of babies, before the expropriations of goods for political motives, before the condemnations to death without convincing base... etc. and etc. Clearer: In the device of the Spanish Justice there abound still the servants public who as such do not deserve respect. About what respect does he speak Dívar?: how does he dare to say that it is intolerable that a citizen doubts the credibility of an institution?: how does dare an educated person to demand that we should forget the silence of the illustrated lambs and with toga that applied the criteria and values of those who from the Power were stealing and murdering?... It is necessary to respect legal ruling? Flatly, yes. Is it necessary to receive communion with mill wheels and to avoid the criticism of the decisions that the officials as such adopt? With the same rotundity, no. The person called Carlos Dívar Blanco deserves respect, undoubtedly, with the same grade and intensity that mortal any other: not more! And when he exercises the profession his resolutions must be respected, undoubtedly; but that we respect acríticamente everything all that dictates, declares or signature is another thing. Respect is not synonymous of submission. LINKAGE to "The naked emperor and other incredible stories", for José Yoldi, in The country. IN ADVANCE, in ImP: "It was not enough to the justice to resign, also the victims must continue in the ditches", "The extreme right has submitted the Supreme Court" and "Bambi only uses with steadfastness with the friends". OF INTEREST: "A group of intelligentsia posiciona against the impunity of the pro-Franco genocide", in NEW TRIBUNE.