The process puts Waiter to the Kingdom of Spain where it deserves

Read the car that signs the magistrate of the Supreme Court that accuses Baltasar Garzón of incurring a corruption crime for trying - according to the instructor - to investigate the pro-Franco crimes, there are aspects that deserve to be underlined: 1. The procedure is a fruit of a complaint formulated by the officials' trade union Manos Limpias; initiative which there joined a group named Freedom and Identity and Spanish Phalange of the Meetings of Offensive National syndicalist (FE-JONS). 2. The instructor sustains part of his argumentation in which Waiter is incompetent to investigate crimes of the dictatorship due to badly called law of amnesty of 1977; this text that is a preconstitutional perversion that only has served to excuse all kinds of responsibilities to those who committed an offense (they even killed) with the protection of the administrative and judicial authorities of the dictatorship. To whom they committed an offense fighting the illegal diet of general Franco only there was applied the pardon of 3 years that there granted the new pro-Franco head of the state (the king) in December, 1975 after assuming the charge. In fact, the antifraquistas to which they were excused partially or completely you suffer for crimes committed before 1977 (year of the false amnesty) only there was applied to them the induto of December, 1975 or, in any case, personal pardons. 3. Her bad called law of amnesty of 1977 breaks with criteria of general acceptance in International law on having constituted a law of final point (or it autoamnesties); that is to say, the pardon of the crimes - many of them of lesa humanity and imprescriptibles - perpetrated to the cover and/or in defense all at once of the State and a dictatorship. 4. The rudeness of those who still now consider to be as a general amnesty the law of final point of 1977 turns into shamelessness if it is born in mind that it was establishing that “nothing of the ready thing” in her - this way it consists in the text - prevents from celebrating judgment and condemning those who committed crimes as the general beginning of the Right recognized by the international community, what demonstrates that if there have not been judged thousands of crimes perpetrated by the diet and his servants it is because the Spanish device of Justice - also after the approval of the Constitution of 1978 - it closed and it keeps on closing the eyes. 5. All the governments had in Spain after the approval of the Constitution of 1978 are accomplices of the legal excesses that by omission, by interest or by premeditated inhibition are perpetrated in the Kingdom of Spain on not having stopped and to be judged to hundreds of delinquents. There an example of shamelessness goes: there are more than 30.000 disappearances or minors' sequestrations that continue without having given turned out comparable penalties to the clear penal responsibilities which there incurred his authors, between whom relevancy public positions abound. 6. The Law of Historical Memory that the zapaterismo designed is one of the most aberrant juridical foolishnesses perpetrated in a democratic diet and of Right. Not only it does not cost for anything, but also it has been used to cheat thousands of victims and citizens - although not to all - and to satisfy those who keep on benefiting of the crimes - included thousands of hereditary thefts - perpetrated even more than two years after general Franco has died. 7. Most of the members of the Supreme Court had from 1978 until today have sworn the beginning of the Movement and they declared his loyalty to the pro-Franco diet - as the current head of the state - therefore if in Spain there had been a democratic transition with openwork, these persons should have been disqualified from showing excellent responsibilities in a democracy without tones. 8. If the procedure opened against Waiter goes forward and manages to separate this judge of the Administration of justice, the State will demonstrate without doubt shade that Spain is … you put the epithet... and he will confirm what the facts have already proved: too many judges and magistrates have affair in legalistic arguments removed from the reality and caught by fears (or interests) inherited from the dictatorship. In this line, practically none of them has endorsed with his authority the exhumations that try to verify the identities of the tens of thousands of persons missing and murdered during the Franco period. This juridical and ethical cowardice is even more serious if it is born in mind that with these exhumations he does not try to judge anybody, but simply to identify and to give worth grave to victims of terrorism, in this case terrorism of the State. 9. The instructor of the procedure opened to Waiter is on the point of obtaining what the Spanish Justice has avoided: to set publicly and internationally to the Kingdom of Spain in the place that it deserves. OF INTEREST: "The reaction for Waiter", in P+DH; "The hunting", in The country, and "The defense of Waiter", in DIGITAL STAR.