"I love Escassi", with the brain in the fly

The Institute of the Woman, whose director is Laura Seara, has called on to Tele5 to that I reconsiders the emission of the program love Escassi (I love Escassi), for "denigrating" the image of the woman and male chauvinists breathe "the attitudes of violence and domination". Seara does not lack reason, the program is atrocious, without palliative. Nevertheless, a hypothetical Institute of the Male also should criticize I love Escassi, since the men are ridiculed on having represented and having spread like paradigm of the masculinity a superficial, scarce intelligence individual and with the brain at a height of the fly. Abounding in considerations, the following step of the Institute of the Woman well might consist of investigating because most of viewers / experts of this program and of similar others they are women and mujeras... ADVISABLE READING to verify that the machismo also has deep religious roots, in this case very catholic:" Two misogynous texts of the XVIIth century ", in the binnacle THE NATURALISTIC REVOLUTION. For when a letter of the Institute of the Woman to the Vatican protesting for the systematical discrimination of the females in the Catholic, Apostolic and Roman Church?

It was not enough to the justice to resign, also the victims must continue in the ditches

Is here another consequence of: copy? transition to the democracy that was done in Spain:" This time Waiter is not going to escape from this one ", has warned Spanish Phalange of the Meetings of Offensive National syndicalist (FAITH of the JONS), organization that fed the coup d'état of July 18, 1936, partipó actively in this episode, in the war and in the repression organized by the State for almost 40 years. Now, thirty two years after there is approved the Constitution of 1978 that finished the dictatorship, her: copy? Spanish transition not only remains opened, but also it is necessary to punish the judge who has tried to systematize a legal procedure to locate the burials of the shot ones with the only purpose of which they are worthily buried or incinerated. It has not been enough to resign to which purify the penal responsibilities which there incurred those who under protection of the political power committed an offense from April 1, 1939 until November 20, 1975 - apart from there gave for everything settled all that happened during the war - also they want: also the PP! - that the relatives of the dead persons give up finding the corpses and, in addition, they move Rome with Santiago to punish those who try not to lose the memory and return the dignity to the buried ones and missing persons. You ask politically incorrect: Do you think that the ideological heirs of the Franco period have assumed the proper beginning of the democratic State of Right?... It is justifiable the disinclination of Phalange and of the PP to which recover the corpses of the murdered ones and missing persons?... The transition to has the democracy been really so model as the leading political class insists for already three decades?. . Giving advisable, necessary or inevitable the resignation to judge the crimes of the dictatorship: also is it necessary to resign from the dignity of the victims?... It is understandable that the device of the democratic State of Right offers to punish those who look for legal chinks to satisfy the right to the personal dignity of the victims and of his families? LINKAGE to informative texts on the ideological and judicial offensive thrown from several fronts against the judge Baltasar Garzón. OF INTEREST: "Waiter does not improve", in ESCOLAR.NET. IN ADVANCE, in ImP: "Major Ear, his forgetfulness is the egg of the snake" and "there are Already 130.137 tests of the pro-Franco disgrace".

To the president of the Supreme Court: We are not subjects, but citizens

Vignette captured in The cave of Daimao Hoy there are spoiled news the declarations realized by the very catholic president of the Supreme Court of the Kingdom of Spain, Carlos Dívar, who in addition to mixing religious beliefs with judicial responsibilities, claims that the citizens not only we respect the decisions of the Justice but also we are quiet when they seem clearly unjust, ideological or atrocious to us. In the democratic State of Right it is forced to respect the resolutions of the courts, but that the president of the Supreme Court and of the General Council of the Judicial Power of the democratic State of Right demands forced respect it is, when less, a fruit of his deficient formation as for democratic beginning; this defect, nevertheless, that is understandable in those who swore to fulfill and make to fulfill the laws of a genocidal dictatorship. . No radical Spanish citizen and sincerely democratic he doubts that the judgments of the courts must be respected; more nobody ignores - except the misinformed ones - that in the Spanish Justice device there abound those who during long years kept silence before the systematical theft of babies, before the expropriations of goods for political motives, before the condemnations to death without convincing base... etc. and etc. Clearer: In the device of the Spanish Justice there abound still the servants public who as such do not deserve respect. About what respect does he speak Dívar?: how does he dare to say that it is intolerable that a citizen doubts the credibility of an institution?: how does dare an educated person to demand that we should forget the silence of the illustrated lambs and with toga that applied the criteria and values of those who from the Power were stealing and murdering?... It is necessary to respect legal ruling? Flatly, yes. Is it necessary to receive communion with mill wheels and to avoid the criticism of the decisions that the officials as such adopt? With the same rotundity, no. The person called Carlos Dívar Blanco deserves respect, undoubtedly, with the same grade and intensity that mortal any other: not more! And when he exercises the profession his resolutions must be respected, undoubtedly; but that we respect acríticamente everything all that dictates, declares or signature is another thing. Respect is not synonymous of submission. LINKAGE to "The naked emperor and other incredible stories", for José Yoldi, in The country. IN ADVANCE, in ImP: "It was not enough to the justice to resign, also the victims must continue in the ditches", "The extreme right has submitted the Supreme Court" and "Bambi only uses with steadfastness with the friends". OF INTEREST: "A group of intelligentsia posiciona against the impunity of the pro-Franco genocide", in NEW TRIBUNE.

He debates on the law of boxes of Gallicia: Dodges and deceits

In Gallicia and owing to the making, earlier, and now of the reform of the Lei of Caixas (the episode also has been lived or one lives in other autonomous regions) a sour political polemic has been opened between those who bet for using the law to force the merger of two existing boxes (Caixa Gallicia and Caixanova) and those who do without this possibility or confront the matter with independence of this purpose - without impairment of which it is positive for the Galician economy. The positions of some and others, nevertheless, have tones (PP and BNG, for example, have been objective Allied Forces in the Parliament Galego at the time of voting for the text of the Lei of Caixas, but his criteria differ in numerous aspects). [Concerning the positions that defend the political parties, to see "Merger of the Galician boxes: Match, gentlemen!" ] The law approved in the autonomic Chamber was appealed before the Constitutional one to instances of the Council of the State (this detail that some of them relegate and try to conceal) for a fundamental motive: the text approved in the Galician Chamber grants to the autonomic Executive powers that, between other things, invade competitions of control that are optional of the Spanish Bank, amen of that grants right veto Consello da Xunta in strategic operations of or the boxes with head office in Gallicia. There are other causes of possible unconstitutionality, but they perform minor scope. The weeks happen and the positions scarcely have changed, so that the negotiation Xunta-Central government to adapt I Read it of Caixas to the indications of the Council of the State it is suspended although the time runs against all and of everything, not only of the followers of the merger, but also against the progress or sanitation of both entities, since the term to make use of the fund of bank restructuring (FROB) becomes exhausted. In any case, in the episode there are two aspects that attract attention. 1st: Almost nobody speaks about economy. It turns out to be shocking that if so much Caixa Gallicia as Caixanova enjoys so good economic situation - as the realized consultancies have certified and as they affirm that all that have thought on this matter from different positions-: why is so much determination in fusing them or incorporating them into agreements into entities of other communities, and if so well they are, why so many insistence in which it is necessary to resort to the FROB? Or perhaps an interested mirage has been created and are not the accounts of the boxes so good as they say?: will not it be that both boxes accuse delicate situations that advise to join them or to fuse them with others and to do it without delays? The true thing is that in the negotiations Xunta-Central government and also in the set of the Galician society - from the means up to the chats of coffee and the circles of the elite - one speaks about the matter from a political point of view and punctually juridically, but rarely one alludes to the economy and to the accounting or to the practices of both entities. 2nd: What is the Galician financial system that thing about? It has become fashionable to speak about the Galician financial system up to the end of which this entity has been turned into the key of vault of those who defend I read it of such Caixas which has been approved in Santiago and of those who insist on fusing two entities in presence. The most curious of this argument is that a Galician financial system does not exist. Moreover, not only it does not exist, but also to use this expression or definition is an obvious test of the high grade of politicization and of the scarce economic rigor with which the matter is confronted. Any financial system consists of three essential elements: assets and financial debits, institutions and markets. None of these three elements happens in case of the autonomous regions, in those of Madrid, Catalonia or Basque Country, for quoting territories that are quoted in Gallicia like ambiences of financial systems to imitate not also. It is a question of a deceit of immeasurable proportions. The only financial system that exists in Spain is of state ambience and, hence, with reservations, so since the Economic and Monetary Union (UEM) was started all the States that have joined to the euroarea have transferred monetary-financial competences in the European Central Bank (BCE) and, objectively, there exists already a germ of the only financial system of European ambience that, theoretically, member of the Union will have to advance to the same rhythm that there reduce the competitions and independence of the monetary and financial systems of every State. I know by intuition that those who insist on alluding repeatedly to the virtual Galician financial system do it with the legitimate and positive intention of underlining that it is convenient: undoubtedly! - that the social head office of or of the Galician boxes it continues in Gallicia. But also I know by intuition that between those well deliberate there are those who resort at about the Galician financial system not to enter slightly edifying gardens of the underworld of the boxes. It is curious, that the domes of the political parties with representation in the Parliament Galego (PP, PSdG and BNG) remember now the galleguidad of the boxes and, on the other hand, they were saying nothing when these boxes were investing tens million euros in companies foreign to Gallicia that were speculating on the brick (paradigmatic case has been the high investment of Caixa Gallicia in the bluf Astroc, where there have evaporated tens million euros proceeding from the saving of the Galicians. Why does not speak to himself about this scandal politician - financier led by an entity who benefits of being protected by the Galician Administration). That speaks to himself about those who bandage wealth! To speak about the nonexistent Galician financial system also is used by some to avoid one of the most substantial debates for the future of the Galician economy and that almost always is avoided: What to do so that the companies, societies and entities with more economic weight in the Galician country stop being alienated and/or move his head offices out of the community? The Fenosa acquisition for Electrical Union Of Madrid, which gave place to Union-Fenosa, marked a milestone; but there have been losses so much or more significant in almost all the sectors. The last operation of this type was a news last week: The buy of two plants transformadoras of the milk sector (in Vilalba and her Swim) on the part of the French multinational Lactalis. Businessmen, boxes and other Galician economic agents gave the back again to the milk sector of the country. It is a suma and it is still constant and, therefore, it is logical and deserves applause that voices lift demanding to finish this bloodletting, since it is necessary to reason that if the boxes finish in entities hands with head office out of the Galician country, the circle will have closed to a great extent. This is the aspect on which yes it would be necessary to insist every day: the propensity of too many Galician economic leaders to desgalleguizar his companies and his assets and, finally, the facility with which they sell and export power of decision, capitals and also savings. The axis of the debate of the boxes happens round there, instead of alluding to a system that does not exist and which allusion, in addition, helps to impoverish the economic culture of the citizens. Streaming Desperate Housewives S06E17 Chromolume #7 now

"The extreme right has submitted the Supreme Court"

Of that the Spanish Administration of justice does not work as it must there are clear tests. The curious thing is that whenever there is a problem - the one that is - it resorts to the one that is already a cliché: the independence. Why whenever there is a contentious one or a problem - it is the one that is - there are so many judges and magistrates, included those of the Supreme one, those of the General Council of the Judicial Power and those of the professional associations that limit practically everything to the independence?: about what ideological independence do they speak, about the independence of the judges and magistrates that swore the Beginning of the Movement?: or do they refer to the proper independence of the limbo to which, like nonexistent virtue, it is possible only to gain access refusing to think? The ex-one fiscal anticorruption Carlos Jiménez Villarejo in an interview that The country publishes today has summed the situation up saying that the ideology that occupies first place in the Supreme one is that of the extreme right. The reactions have been immediate. And again with the rattle of the independence! Is independence - I ask - equivalent to have sworn allegiance to the Franco period and now to close the eyes before the exploitation of the laws, for example, to prevent the corruption from being investigated? It is clear that in the judicature there are things that smell badly - ideologically speaking - but for the sake of the well-worn independence it turns out that there is seen badly thinking, to criticize and, hence, all - Villarejo and Waiter also - we are forced to say amen and to repeat like loritos that the Spanish Justice accuses shortcomings owed only and exclusively to the absence of independence... Have they taken us as idiots?: or perhaps we it are? Without opening doors and windows, any housing ends up by smelling badly The problem is not that there are political parties, ideologies and discrepancies; not even it is not a problem either that there are judges who think this way or asá. Will the prophets of the independence have thought for the independence that probably there are things that smell badly because the institution has never been aired? Because a thing is that the judicial power is indepediente, that it it is already, and to prohibit other one the judges to have criterion. Will not it be that any of them claim that his criteria are the good only ones, the only ones legítmos, the Spanish only ones and the only ones that are the only, big and free? The axis of the matter is not either that the cavern the haya taken with Baltasar Garzón - the cavern has never stopped working, apart from the fact that the extreme right has constitutional law to exist and to act inside the law-; the really worrying thing is that there are so many followers of a concept uniformador of independence that serves, for example, to do all the possible and the impossible thing to make difficult or to prevent the inhumanaciones of the murdered ones by the Franco period and to make difficult or dinamitar the judicial investigation of the plot Gürtel, between other things. The worrying thing is not that there are sensibilities and ideologies, the worrying thing is that in the judicature there are so many professionals who quite sum it up alluding to the independence... Will 2 refer to that of demayo?" Judges and district attorneys have been 25 years eating of the hand of the banking", has added Villarejo, that very opportunely and without being missing to the truth he has remembered that banking institutions "have contributed important quantities, paying accommodation expenses and of course slightly more"... Live through the independence! The Justice does not work well and they - judges and magistrates - know it. And also they know perfectly that the fundamental problem is not in the ideological independence of the juces and magistrates. Between other things, because nobody who thinks is aideológico. I insist: Will they refer to the independence of May 2, 1808? The one who wants to understand it, will understand it... And if some brains five-peseta coin does not fall down of the donkey, there a track goes: The Spanish Parliament of Cadiz was in his moment more innovative than the Constituent Spanish Parliament of 1977. It would be convenient to speak less of the independence of 1808 and: once and for all!, to open the doors and to air the house so that it stops smelling badly.

The process puts Waiter to the Kingdom of Spain where it deserves

Read the car that signs the magistrate of the Supreme Court that accuses Baltasar Garzón of incurring a corruption crime for trying - according to the instructor - to investigate the pro-Franco crimes, there are aspects that deserve to be underlined: 1. The procedure is a fruit of a complaint formulated by the officials' trade union Manos Limpias; initiative which there joined a group named Freedom and Identity and Spanish Phalange of the Meetings of Offensive National syndicalist (FE-JONS). 2. The instructor sustains part of his argumentation in which Waiter is incompetent to investigate crimes of the dictatorship due to badly called law of amnesty of 1977; this text that is a preconstitutional perversion that only has served to excuse all kinds of responsibilities to those who committed an offense (they even killed) with the protection of the administrative and judicial authorities of the dictatorship. To whom they committed an offense fighting the illegal diet of general Franco only there was applied the pardon of 3 years that there granted the new pro-Franco head of the state (the king) in December, 1975 after assuming the charge. In fact, the antifraquistas to which they were excused partially or completely you suffer for crimes committed before 1977 (year of the false amnesty) only there was applied to them the induto of December, 1975 or, in any case, personal pardons. 3. Her bad called law of amnesty of 1977 breaks with criteria of general acceptance in International law on having constituted a law of final point (or it autoamnesties); that is to say, the pardon of the crimes - many of them of lesa humanity and imprescriptibles - perpetrated to the cover and/or in defense all at once of the State and a dictatorship. 4. The rudeness of those who still now consider to be as a general amnesty the law of final point of 1977 turns into shamelessness if it is born in mind that it was establishing that “nothing of the ready thing” in her - this way it consists in the text - prevents from celebrating judgment and condemning those who committed crimes as the general beginning of the Right recognized by the international community, what demonstrates that if there have not been judged thousands of crimes perpetrated by the diet and his servants it is because the Spanish device of Justice - also after the approval of the Constitution of 1978 - it closed and it keeps on closing the eyes. 5. All the governments had in Spain after the approval of the Constitution of 1978 are accomplices of the legal excesses that by omission, by interest or by premeditated inhibition are perpetrated in the Kingdom of Spain on not having stopped and to be judged to hundreds of delinquents. There an example of shamelessness goes: there are more than 30.000 disappearances or minors' sequestrations that continue without having given turned out comparable penalties to the clear penal responsibilities which there incurred his authors, between whom relevancy public positions abound. 6. The Law of Historical Memory that the zapaterismo designed is one of the most aberrant juridical foolishnesses perpetrated in a democratic diet and of Right. Not only it does not cost for anything, but also it has been used to cheat thousands of victims and citizens - although not to all - and to satisfy those who keep on benefiting of the crimes - included thousands of hereditary thefts - perpetrated even more than two years after general Franco has died. 7. Most of the members of the Supreme Court had from 1978 until today have sworn the beginning of the Movement and they declared his loyalty to the pro-Franco diet - as the current head of the state - therefore if in Spain there had been a democratic transition with openwork, these persons should have been disqualified from showing excellent responsibilities in a democracy without tones. 8. If the procedure opened against Waiter goes forward and manages to separate this judge of the Administration of justice, the State will demonstrate without doubt shade that Spain is … you put the epithet... and he will confirm what the facts have already proved: too many judges and magistrates have affair in legalistic arguments removed from the reality and caught by fears (or interests) inherited from the dictatorship. In this line, practically none of them has endorsed with his authority the exhumations that try to verify the identities of the tens of thousands of persons missing and murdered during the Franco period. This juridical and ethical cowardice is even more serious if it is born in mind that with these exhumations he does not try to judge anybody, but simply to identify and to give worth grave to victims of terrorism, in this case terrorism of the State. 9. The instructor of the procedure opened to Waiter is on the point of obtaining what the Spanish Justice has avoided: to set publicly and internationally to the Kingdom of Spain in the place that it deserves. OF INTEREST: "The reaction for Waiter", in P+DH; "The hunting", in The country, and "The defense of Waiter", in DIGITAL STAR.

Three million signatures against the digital canon

The platform Todoscontraelcanon has presented in the Congress of the Deputies three million signatures proposing the elimination of the digital canon. The step has been led by the president of the Spanish Association of Net users, Víctor Domingo, and that of the Association of Internet Users, Miguel Pérez Subías. The preventive tax that the Government imposed "fond of families and of medium and small business", therefore his retreat "can do very much in favor of the sustainable economy and the culture". Precisely, the law of: sustainable economy! drafted by the Government he contemplates the closing web page concerning hours - by means of a brief procedure that reduces the judicial competences in a paripé - and obviates a digital canon that, "according to reports of the National Commission of the Competition, is distributed between very small", has underlined Pérez Subías. MORE DETAILS, in The voice of Gallicia. ATTENTION! into most of the citizens there has drawn the belief of which those who buy electronic, ordering ingenuities, Mp3 or cedés and the Net users are the only ones that pay a canon... It is not like that: In the libraries also canon is paid!